LIVE --:--:-- UTC Tracking 38 incident types from official agencies and local news worldwide Report an incident
Rivers and the sea · England · Environment Agency data updated 6 July 2026

RG9 Flood Risk

In postcode district RG9 (South Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire), 650 of 14,822 properties (4.4%) are in areas at high or medium risk of flooding from rivers and the sea — at least a 1 in 100 chance in any year — per Environment Agency data updated 6 July 2026; that is the 271st highest count of 2,181 districts in England.

Check an address — gov.uk ↗Flood warnings nowRiver levels

472
Properties at high risk
178
Properties at medium risk
4.4%
Share at high or medium (of 14,822)
92
Postcodes with any property at high or medium

By bandProperties in RG9 by flood-risk band

Risk bandChance of flooding each yearAll propertiesHomes
High3.3% (1 in 30) or greater chance in any year472314
Mediumbetween 1% and 3.3% (1 in 100 to 1 in 30) chance in any year178143
Lowbetween 0.1% and 1% (1 in 1,000 to 1 in 100) chance in any year539368
Very lowless than 0.1% (1 in 1,000) chance in any year22

457 of the high- or medium-risk properties are homes and 104 are non-residential (shops, offices, farms, public buildings); the rest are unclassified. By share, RG9 ranks 270th of 2,084 districts with at least 500 properties.

Postcode sectorsWhere in RG9 the risk sits

SectorPropertiesHighMediumLowVery lowHigh + medium share
RG9 14,9193433 27401.4%
RG9 22,20016280 15011.0%
RG9 31,44916337 215213.8%
RG9 41,830404 3002.4%
RG9 52,21800 000.0%
RG9 62,2067324 504.4%

Recorded floodsPast floods mapped near RG9

The Environment Agency has mapped flood outlines on 7 dates near RG9 since 1947; the most recent started on 9 Feb 2009.

StartedPlace / name in the recordSource of floodingCause
9 Feb 2009 – 20 Feb 2009Henley Fluvial 4 outlinesMain riverChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
19 Jul 2007 – 29 Jul 2007Fawley Fluvial Water 24 outlinesMain riverChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
23 Dec 2002 – 12 Jan 2003— 16 outlinesOther, main riverChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
1 Jan 2000 – 12 Dec 2000— 51 outlinesMain riverChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
1 Jan 1990 – 12 Dec 1990— 9 outlinesMain river, otherChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
1 Jan 1974 – 12 Dec 1974— 37 outlinesMain river, otherChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)
1 Jan 1947 – 12 Dec 1947— 4 outlinesMain riverChannel capacity exceeded (no raised defences)

What this page shows, and what it misses

The Environment Agency's count of properties in each postcode that sit in areas of land at very low, low, medium or high risk of flooding from rivers and the sea, allowing for flood defences and their condition, added up here by postcode district and local authority. Every property in England is counted once, so the share is of all properties in the area.

It misses: surface water (heavy rain), groundwater, sewer and reservoir flooding; Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; and anything about a single building. A band describes the land a property stands on, not its floor level or flood protection, so it is not a forecast for any one home. Past floods come from the EA's Recorded Flood Outlines and are placed in the postcode district whose centre is nearest (within 12 km), so a flood near a boundary can be listed under a neighbour. Older records are patchy, and a flood with no outline is not listed.

Local authorities in RG9

Parishes in RG9: Binfield Heath, Bix and Assendon, Checkendon, Fawley, Great Marlow, Hambleden, Harpsden, Henley-on-Thames, Highmoor, Hurley, Ibstone, Lane End, Nettlebed, Nuffield, Pishill with Stonor, Remenham, Rotherfield Greys, Rotherfield Peppard, Shiplake, Shirburn, Sonning Common, Stoke Row, Swyncombe, Turville, Wargrave, Watlington.

If you live in RG9

Nearby districts

RG4 RG10 RG5 SL7 RG1 RG6 RG30 OX49

FAQQuestions people ask

Is RG9 at risk of flooding?

In postcode district RG9 (South Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire), 650 of 14,822 properties (4.4%) are in areas at high or medium risk of flooding from rivers and the sea — at least a 1 in 100 chance in any year — per Environment Agency data updated 6 July 2026; that is the 271st highest count of 2,181 districts in England.

How many homes in RG9 are at high risk of flooding?

314 homes (residential properties) in RG9 are in areas at high risk (3.3% or greater chance each year) and 143 at medium risk, out of 11,250 homes, per Environment Agency data updated 6 July 2026. This counts rivers and the sea only, not surface water.

Has RG9 flooded before?

The Environment Agency has mapped flood outlines on 7 dates near RG9 since 1947; the most recent started on 9 Feb 2009.

How do I check the flood risk for my own address in RG9?

Use the government's long-term flood risk checker (check-long-term-flood-risk.service.gov.uk): it shows rivers and the sea, surface water, reservoirs and groundwater for one address. District figures here are totals and cannot tell you about a single home.

Flood risk counts: Environment Agency, Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea – Postcodes in Areas at Risk and Recorded Flood Outlines, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2025. All rights reserved. Some features of this information are based on digital spatial data from the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, © NERC (CEH). © Crown Copyright and Database Rights 2025 OS AC0000807064. This product is produced in part from PAF® and Multiple Residence Data, the copyright in which is owned by Royal Mail Group Limited and/or Royal Mail Group plc. All rights reserved. Licence number AC0000807064.

Local authority of each postcode: Office for National Statistics postcode lookup (May 2026), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. Contains Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2026. District centres and place names: postcodes.io (ONS/OS open data). Totals, ranks and grouping are Global Incident Tracker's own calculations; the Environment Agency does not endorse them.